Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threads

Summary

As breaking news unfolds people increasingly rely on social media to stay abreast of the latest updates. The use of social media in such situations comes with the caveat that new information being released piecemeal may encourage rumours, many of which remain unverified long after their point of release. Little is known, however, about the dynamics of the life cycle of a social media rumour. In this paper we present a methodology that has enabled us to collect, identify and annotate a dataset of 330 rumour threads (4,842 tweets) associated with 9 newsworthy events. We analyse this dataset to understand how users spread, support, or deny rumours that are later proven true or false, by distinguishing two levels of status in a rumour life cycle i.e., before and after its veracity status is resolved. The identification of rumours associated with each event, as well as the tweet that resolved each rumour as true or false, was performed by journalist members of the research team who tracked the events in real time. Our study shows that rumours that are ultimately proven true tend to be resolved faster than those that turn out to be false. Whilst one can readily see users denying rumours once they have been debunked, users appear to be less capable of distinguishing true from false rumours when their veracity remains in question. In fact, we show that the prevalent tendency for users is to support every unverified rumour. We also analyse the role of different types of users, finding that highly reputable users such as news organisations endeavour to post well-grounded statements, which appear to be certain and accompanied by evidence. Nevertheless, these often prove to be unverified pieces of information that give rise to false rumours. Our study reinforces the need for developing robust machine learning techniques that can provide assistance in real time for assessing the veracity of rumours. The findings of our study provide useful insights for achieving this aim.

Key Points

• 1Users tend to support unverified rumours until their veracity is confirmed
• 2True rumours are resolved more quickly than false ones
• 3Highly reputable users may propagate unverified information despite their credibility
• 4The study highlights the need for machine learning techniques to assess rumour veracity in real time.

Related articles

• Understanding Argumentation: A Guide to Effective Communication and Reasoning

  This guide offers a comprehensive framework for understanding argumentation in various contexts, emphasizing the importance of ethical reasoning, effective communication, and critical thinking. It explores the structure of arguments, the role of audiences, and the significance of argumentation in civic life and decision-making.

• Guess Who Communicates?

  This document engages students in guessing which communication professionals are described through various clues and examples of their audiences. It aims to enhance understanding of communication roles, theories, and ethical responsibilities.

• The Discipline of Communication

  This document explores the discipline of communication, defining it, discussing its elements, and describing various models and principles that govern effective communication practices. It emphasizes the importance of communication in personal and social contexts and addresses the challenges and goals associated with effective communication.

• THE COMMUNICATION PROCESS

  This document explores the intricacies of the communication process, detailing key elements, types, barriers, and models that define how people exchange information and ideas. It serves as a comprehensive guide for understanding effective communication in various contexts.

• The History of Communication Studies across the Americas: An Introduction

  This document serves as an introduction to a special section that explores the historical development of communication and media studies in the Americas, highlighting transnational influences and the contributions of various scholars across different national contexts.