In the Matter of the Charges of Plagiarism against Associate Justice Mariano C. Del Castillo

[data-text-reader-ssr]{position:static!important;clip:auto!important;clip-path:none!important;width:auto!important;height:100%!important;padding:0!important;margin:0!important;overflow:visible!important;white-space:normal!important}[data-pdf-skeleton]{display:none!important}

100%

Login Try now

00:00:00

01:39:17

79uv-2026-02-04_11_29_39-a-m-no-10-7-17-sc.pdf

DECISION

The Background Facts

The Issues

The Court's Rulings

The Passages from Tams

The Passages from Ellis and Criddle-Descent

The Explanation

First Finding

Second Finding

Third Finding

No Misconduct

No Inexcusable Negligence

DISSENTING OPINION

TABLES OF COMPARISON

Forms of Plagiarism

Violations of Rules against Plagiarism in the Vinuya Decision

The Place of the Plagiarized

How the Majority Decision Treated the Specific Allegations of Plagiarism

Plagiarism and Judicial Plagiarism

Penalties for Plagiarism and Judicial Plagiarism

On Guilt and Hypocrisy

The Unfortunate Result of the Majority Decision

The Way Forward

Response to the Decretal Portion of the Majority Decision

Joevanie Arellano Tabasa vs. Hon. Court of Appeals, Bureau of Immigration and Deportation, and Wilson Soluren

PCC Guidelines on Merger Remedies

In the Matter of the Proposed Acquisition by Universal Robina Corporation of Assets of Central Azucarera Don Pedro, Inc. and Roxas Holdings, Inc.

In the Matter of the Proposed Acquisition by International Container Terminal Services, Inc. of Shares in the Manila North Harbour Port, Inc.

Manfredi and Others Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) 13 July 2006