CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION

CLIMATE ADAPTATION AND MITIGATION

One. INTRODUCTION

Africa stands at a pivotal juncture in the global climate discourse, confronted by a strategic dilemma: should it prioritise adaptation, which responds to the lived impacts of climate change, or continue to invest in mitigation, which targets its root causes? While mitigation remains the dominant global narrative, driven by carbon markets and emission reduction targets, it offers limited relief to communities already facing floods, droughts, displacement, and food insecurity. Adaptation, by contrast, provides both short-term protection and long-term resilience, making it a more immediate and justice-driven response for the continent.

Before engaging the technical and legal complexities of this debate, it is essential to clarify the key terms. Adaptation refers to the adjustment of ecological, social, or economic systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli and their effects. Mitigation, on the other hand, involves reducing greenhouse gas emissions to slow the pace of global warming.

Africa's climate vulnerability is not merely environmental. It is deeply political. The continent suffers from climate injustice, having contributed minimally to global emissions yet bearing the brunt of their consequences. Historically, Africa has served as the supplier of raw materials that sustained the industrial economies of the Global North. Before the Industrial Revolution, agrarian systems dominated. But the adoption of fossil fuel-driven industrialisation, marked by widespread deforestation, rapid urbanisation, coal combustion, and oil exploitation, has led to the long-term degradation of the planet. What was once hailed as progress now reveals itself, three centuries later, as a global reckoning: the once green continent, now ravaged by drought, catastrophic floods, desertification and the spread of diseases, making it increasingly uninhabitable.

Perhaps the pioneers of industrialisation might have drawn the line had they foreseen the consequences. Some thinkers did. In eighteen thirty-two, German polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe warned: "Man in his misguidance has powerfully interfered with nature. He has devastated the forests, and thereby even changed the atmospheric conditions and climate ... These and other things are serious encroachments upon Nature, which men nowadays entirely overlook but which are of the greatest importance."

Yet such voices were ignored, dismissed as poetic rather than prophetic. Today, the cliché "we'll cross that bridge when we get there" no longer suffices; we have arrived at that bridge. The question now is urgent and unavoidable: This paper argues that Africa must reframe its climate strategy to foreground adaptation as a constitutional, fiscal, and ethical imperative, rather than continuing to export mitigation outcomes that serve external interests more than local survival.

Two. Climate Change

Climate change is widely recognised as one of the most pressing challenges of the twenty-first century, characterised by long-term alterations in global temperature, precipitation patterns, and the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. Although the Global South, particularly African nations, contributes less than four percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, it bears a disproportionate share of the consequences. These include heightened food insecurity, desertification, coastal erosion, and increasingly destructive floods.