Micro-Learning Techniques for Busy Academics

The 15-Minute Research Sprint Micro-learning techniques fill the gap between teaching loads, research deadlines, administrative duties, and personal commitments of today’s academic time crunch. The solution isn’t finding more hours in the day – it’s revolutionizing how you learn through micro-learning. This science-backed micro-learning approach transforms scattered moments into powerful knowledge-building sessions, making micro-learning the …

Kate Windsor

Kate Windsor

facebook listening.com
instagram listening.com
Micro-learning

The 15-Minute Research Sprint

Micro-learning techniques fill the gap between teaching loads, research deadlines, administrative duties, and personal commitments of today’s academic time crunch. The solution isn’t finding more hours in the day – it’s revolutionizing how you learn through micro-learning. This science-backed micro-learning approach transforms scattered moments into powerful knowledge-building sessions, making micro-learning the ultimate productivity strategy for modern scholars.

Key Takeaways: Implementing Academic Micro-Learning

After reading this guide, you should be able to:

  • Design 15-minute learning sprints that fit naturally into your existing academic schedule while maximizing knowledge retention
  • Apply spacing principles to distribute sessions for optimal long-term retention of complex academic concepts
  • Integrate audio learning technology at optimal speeds (1.1x-1.8x) for different types of academic content and time constraints
  • Measure effectiveness using academic-specific metrics like research productivity and knowledge application
  • Build sustainable daily practices that transform fragmented time into consistent academic progress
Listen to this
icon devices
Listen to unlimited research papers
icon papers
Upload from mobile or desktop
Try the appmobile mockup listening.com

The Academic Time Crisis: Why Traditional Learning Models Are Failing

Modern academics operate in a fundamentally different environment than their predecessors. A 2024 survey by the American Association of University Professors revealed that faculty members now spend an average of 61 hours per week on professional duties, with research time increasingly fragmented into brief intervals between meetings, classes, and administrative tasks.

The fragmentation problem: Traditional academic learning assumes large, uninterrupted blocks of time for deep reading and reflection. But when was the last time you had three uninterrupted hours to dive into a research paper? For most academics, sustained focus periods are increasingly rare, making conventional study approaches not just inefficient but practically impossible.

Enter micro-learning: This evidence-based micro-learning approach breaks complex academic content into digestible segments that can be effectively processed in 5-15 minute intervals. Far from being a compromise, micro-learning research shows that this method often produces superior retention and understanding compared to traditional marathon study sessions. Micro-learning strategies have revolutionized how academics consume and retain information.

The Science Behind Micro-Learning for Academic Success

Micro-learning isn’t just a trendy educational buzzword – it’s grounded in decades of cognitive science research. Understanding the scientific principles behind micro-learning helps academics implement these techniques more effectively and builds confidence in this transformative approach to scholarly learning.

Cognitive Load Theory and Micro-Learning

Dr. John Sweller’s groundbreaking research on cognitive load theory explains why micro-learning works so effectively for complex academic material. The human brain can only process a limited amount of new information simultaneously before cognitive overload occurs. Academic content – with its dense theoretical frameworks, technical vocabulary, and interconnected concepts – particularly challenges our cognitive processing capacity.

By chunking academic content into smaller segments, micro-learning respects the brain’s natural processing limitations while maximizing retention. Studies show that information presented in 10-15 minute micro-learning segments produces 17% better long-term retention than equivalent content consumed in longer sessions. This makes micro-learning particularly valuable for academic applications.

The Spacing Effect and Micro-Learning

Hermann Ebbinghaus discovered that distributed practice (spacing learning over time) dramatically improves retention compared to massed practice (cramming). Modern micro-learning research has refined this principle specifically for academic contexts, showing how micro-learning naturally incorporates optimal spacing intervals.

Optimal spacing intervals for academic micro-learning:

  • Initial micro-learning exposure: Immediate review within 24 hours
  • First micro-learning reinforcement: 3-7 days after initial learning
  • Second micro-learning reinforcement: 2-3 weeks later
  • Long-term micro-learning consolidation: 2-3 months later

Micro-learning naturally incorporates spacing by encouraging frequent, brief interactions with material rather than intensive single sessions. This micro-learning approach aligns perfectly with busy academic schedules while optimizing knowledge retention through scientifically-proven spacing principles.

Attention Restoration Theory and Micro-Learning

Academic work demands sustained attention for complex cognitive tasks. However, research by Dr. Kaplan and Dr. Kaplan demonstrates that attention is a finite resource that becomes depleted through intensive use. Micro-learning provides natural attention restoration breaks that actually enhance subsequent learning performance, making micro-learning sessions more effective than traditional marathon study periods.

The micro-learning restoration cycle: 15-minute micro-learning sprints followed by brief mental breaks allow attention to reset, making each subsequent micro-learning session as effective as the first. This contrasts sharply with traditional study marathons, where attention and comprehension steadily decline over time. Micro-learning thus optimizes both individual session effectiveness and overall learning productivity.

Micro-Learning Techniques Specifically Designed for Academic Content

Effective micro-learning for academics requires specialized techniques that address the unique challenges of scholarly content. These micro-learning methods have been developed and tested specifically for academic environments, ensuring that micro-learning approaches work effectively with complex theoretical material, dense research papers, and sophisticated analytical thinking.

The 15-Minute Micro-Learning Research Sprint Method

This foundational micro-learning technique provides the optimal balance of focus and flexibility for academic work. The micro-learning research sprint method has been tested across multiple academic disciplines and consistently produces superior results compared to longer, unstructured study sessions.

Micro-learning sprint structure:

  • Minutes 1-2: Quick micro-learning review of previous session’s key concepts
  • Minutes 3-12: New content consumption at optimal micro-learning pace
  • Minutes 13-15: Active synthesis and micro-learning note consolidation

Academic micro-learning applications:

  • Literature review progression through micro-learning segments
  • Methodology section analysis via micro-learning approaches
  • Theoretical framework development using micro-learning principles
  • Grant proposal research through structured micro-learning sessions

Why 15 minutes works for micro-learning: Research shows this micro-learning duration maximizes focused attention while fitting naturally into academic schedules between meetings, classes, or administrative tasks. The 15-minute micro-learning format respects cognitive limitations while providing sufficient time for meaningful academic progress.

The Concept Mapping Micro-Learning Session

Duration: 10-12 minutes of focused micro-learning Focus: Building connections between academic concepts through micro-learning techniques

Micro-learning process:

  1. Minutes 1-3: Review existing concept map or create new central concept in micro-learning format
  2. Minutes 4-9: Add 2-3 new connections or expand existing relationships through micro-learning exploration
  3. Minutes 10-12: Identify gaps or questions for next micro-learning session

Academic micro-learning value: Particularly powerful for theoretical research, interdisciplinary work, and comprehensive exam preparation. Creates visual knowledge networks through micro-learning that enhance understanding and recall more effectively than traditional note-taking methods.

The Audio Learning Micro-Learning Power Sprint

Duration: 5-20 minutes (adaptable micro-learning sessions to schedule) Method: Optimized audio consumption of academic content through micro-learning techniques

Micro-learning implementation:

  • 5-minute micro-learning sessions: Single concept focus, review familiar material at 1.8x speed
  • 10-minute micro-learning sessions: New content introduction at 1.3x speed with note-taking
  • 15-minute micro-learning sessions: Complex material processing at 1.1x speed with reflection
  • 20-minute micro-learning sessions: Comprehensive chapter or paper section review

Micro-learning scheduling advantages: Can be executed during commutes, exercise, household tasks, or between appointments. Transforms “dead time” into productive micro-learning opportunities, maximizing the efficiency of micro-learning approaches for busy academics.

The Micro-Research Questions Technique

Duration: 8-10 minutes Purpose: Advancing research thinking through focused inquiry

Process:

  1. Minutes 1-2: Identify one specific research question or problem
  2. Minutes 3-7: Rapid information gathering on that specific question
  3. Minutes 8-10: Document insights and formulate follow-up questions

Research benefits: Maintains momentum on long-term projects, generates new research directions, and creates tangible progress even with limited time availability.

Technology Integration for Academic Micro-Learning

Modern micro-learning leverages cutting-edge technology to optimize academic learning experiences. These micro-learning technologies have been specifically designed to support the unique needs of scholarly work, making micro-learning more effective and accessible than ever before.

AI-Powered Content Curation for Micro-Learning

Modern academic micro-learning leverages artificial intelligence to optimize content delivery and personalize micro-learning experiences:

Smart summarization for micro-learning: AI tools can extract key concepts from lengthy papers, creating perfect micro-learning content that maintains academic rigor while fitting micro-learning time constraints Personalized micro-learning pacing: Adaptive systems adjust content difficulty and pace based on individual micro-learning comprehension patterns Context-aware micro-learning: Technology that understands your research focus and suggests relevant micro-learning content aligned with your academic goals

Audio Learning Optimization for Micro-Learning

Text-to-speech technology specifically designed for academic content offers unique micro-learning advantages that transform how scholars consume information:

Variable speed control for micro-learning: Adjust playback speed based on content complexity and available micro-learning time slots Natural pronunciation in micro-learning: Proper handling of technical terminology, citations, and academic language in micro-learning audio Seamless micro-learning integration: Sync across devices for consistent micro-learning experiences throughout the day Offline micro-learning capability: Download content for micro-learning sessions without internet connectivity

Mobile-First Academic Micro-Learning

Smartphone-optimized enables academic progress anywhere, making micro-learning the most flexible approach to scholarly development:

Optimized interfaces: Designed for brief, focused interactions

Progress tracking: Maintain learning momentum across multiple short micro-learning sessions

Smart notification systems: Intelligent reminders for optimal spacing intervals in practice

Discipline-Specific Micro-Learning Strategies

Different academic fields require tailored approaches that respect the unique characteristics of each discipline. These specialized micro-learning strategies ensure that micro-learning techniques work effectively across all areas of scholarly inquiry.

STEM Fields

Mathematical concepts: 10-minute problem-solving micro-learning sprints focusing on single concept applications

Scientific literature via micro-learning: 15-minute paper section analysis with emphasis on methodology and results using micro-learning principles

Technical skills : Brief hands-on practice sessions with specific techniques or software functions through micro-learning approaches

Humanities and Social Sciences

Theoretical frameworks: 12-minute deep dives into specific theoretical applications using micro-learning techniques

Primary source analysis: 15-minute focused examinations of key passages or documents through micro-learning methods

Critical analysis: 10-minute argument deconstruction and evaluation exercises via micro-learning approaches

Interdisciplinary Research

Cross-field connections: 8-minute sessions linking concepts across disciplines through micro-learning exploration

Methodology integration: 15-minute explorations of how different fields approach similar questions using micro-learning techniques

Literature synthesis: 12-minute sessions combining insights from multiple academic traditions via micro-learning methods

Overcoming Common Micro-Learning Obstacles

Successful micro-learning implementation requires addressing common concerns and misconceptions about micro-learning effectiveness. Understanding these micro-learning challenges helps academics implement micro-learning strategies more successfully.

The “Depth vs. Breadth” Concern

Challenge: Fear that micro-learning sacrifices deep understanding for surface coverage

Solution: Micro-learning actually enhances depth through repeated, spaced exposure to concepts. Each brief micro-learning session builds upon previous understanding, creating deeper comprehension over time than single intensive sessions.

Research evidence: Studies comparing micro-learning to traditional study methods show 23% better performance on complex analytical tasks after 4 weeks of distributed micro-learning practice.

Maintaining Academic Rigor

Challenge: Concerns that brief sessions can’t handle complex academic material

Solution: Academic rigor comes from consistent engagement with challenging content, not session length. Micro-learning maintains intellectual standards while improving accessibility and retention through scientifically-proven principles.

Implementation: Use micro-learning sessions for initial concept introduction and understanding, then employ longer sessions when needed for detailed analysis or synthesis alongside your micro-learning routine.

Integration with Existing Academic Workflows

Challenge: Incorporating micro-learning into established research and teaching routines

Solution: Start by identifying existing transition moments in your schedule – times between meetings, while commuting, or during brief breaks. Gradually expand integration as benefits become apparent.

Practical approach: Begin with 2-3 sessions per day, focusing on current research interests or teaching preparation.

Measuring Micro-Learning Effectiveness

Academic-Specific Metrics

Knowledge retention: Test recall of key concepts after 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months Application ability: Assess capacity to use learned concepts in new academic contexts Research productivity: Track progress on research projects and academic writing Teaching improvement: Monitor student feedback and teaching effectiveness measures

Progress Tracking Systems

Learning journals: Brief daily notes on micro-learning sessions and insights gained Concept development: Visual tracking of how understanding evolves over time Research momentum: Documentation of how micro-learning contributes to ongoing projects Time efficiency: Comparison of learning outcomes per minute invested

Long-Term Academic Impact

Career advancement: Track how micro-learning contributes to publication output, conference presentations, and professional development Interdisciplinary growth: Assess expansion of knowledge beyond primary academic specialization Collaborative capacity: Evaluate improved ability to engage with colleagues across different fields

The 15-Minute Academic Transformation

FoundationBuilding- Week 1

  • Days 1-3: Identify optimal times in current schedule
  • Days 4-7: Experiment with different session lengths and content types

Technique Refinement- Week 2

  • Days 8-10: Focus on audio learning optimization and speed calibration
  • Days 11-14: Develop note-taking systems for brief sessions

Integration Expansion- Week 3

  • Days 15-17: Add concept mapping and research question techniques
  • Days 18-21: Connect to ongoing research projects

System Optimization- Week 4

  • Days 22-24: Assess effectiveness and adjust techniques based on results
  • Days 25-28: Establish sustainable long-term routine

Advanced Micro-Learning Strategies for Senior Academics

Grant Writing Acceleration

Daily 15-minute grant sprints: Focus on single grant sections or specific funding opportunity analysis Research justification building: Brief sessions developing compelling arguments for research significance Budget and timeline optimization: Micro-sessions for project planning and resource allocation

Collaborative Research Enhancement

Literature sharing sessions: Brief content reviews to share relevant findings with research partners Methodology alignment: Short sessions ensuring consistent approaches across research teams Progress synchronization: Regular micro-updates on individual research contributions

Academic Leadership Development

Administrative skill building: Brief sessions on management, budgeting, and leadership techniques Policy understanding: Micro-learning sessions on institutional and field-specific policies Networking optimization: Short sessions on relationship building and collaboration strategies

Technology Tools for Academic Micro-Learning

Content Creation and Curation

AI summarization tools: Automatically generate micro-learning content from lengthy academic sources Research aggregators: Compile relevant content from multiple sources into brief, focused sessions Personalization engines: Adapt content difficulty and pacing to individual patterns

Learning Management Systems

Academic-focused platforms: Designed specifically for scholarly content and research workflows Progress tracking: Detailed analytics on patterns and knowledge retention Collaboration features: Share content and insights with research colleagues

Audio Learning Platforms

Academic text-to-speech: Specialized pronunciation of technical terms and scholarly language Variable speed optimization: Precise control over playback speed for different content types Cross-device synchronization: Seamless learning experiences across multiple platforms

Building a Sustainable Academic Practice

Daily Integration Strategies

Morning research reviews: 10-minute sessions reviewing recent developments in your field Transition period: Use brief gaps between activities for sessions Evening consolidation: 15-minute sessions synthesizing information and planning next steps

Weekly Planning and Review

Content scheduling: Plan topics aligned with current research priorities Progress assessment: Weekly review of outcomes and research advancement Technique refinement: Adjust methods based on effectiveness and schedule demands

Long-Term Academic Goals

Research trajectory planning: Use micro-learning to explore new research directions and methodologies Skill development: Systematic acquisition of new academic and technical skills through brief, focused sessions Career advancement: Strategic learning aligned with professional development objectives

The Future of Academic Learning

Institutional Adoption

Forward-thinking academic institutions are beginning to recognize micro-learning as essential for modern scholarly productivity. Professional development programs increasingly incorporate micro-learning principles, and research collaboration tools are being designed with brief, focused interactions in mind.

Research Implications

The effectiveness of micro-learning for academic content has broader implications for how we understand knowledge acquisition and scholarly productivity. As attention becomes increasingly fragmented in our digital age, academics who master this techniques may have significant advantages in research output and career advancement.

Technology Evolution

Emerging technologies – from AI-powered content curation to advanced audio processing – will continue to optimize micro-learning for academic applications. The integration of these tools with existing research workflows promises to make scholarly learning more efficient and effective than ever before.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Can micro-learning really handle complex academic theories and research?

A: Yes, but it requires strategic approach. Complex concepts benefit from being broken into foundational elements that build upon each other across multiple micro-sessions. Research shows that distributed exposure to complex material often produces better understanding than single intensive sessions, as it allows time for mental processing and connection-building between sessions.

Q: How do I maintain academic rigor with such short learning sessions?

A: Academic rigor comes from consistent engagement with challenging content and critical thinking, not session length. Students can maintain rigor by ensuring regular, focused interaction with scholarly material. The key is choosing appropriately challenging content for each session and maintaining high standards for comprehension and analysis.

Q: What’s the optimal balance between micro-learning and traditional longer study sessions?

A: Most successful academics use a hybrid approach: short sessions for regular knowledge building and content consumption, with longer sessions reserved for deep analysis, writing, and synthesis.

Q: How do I fit micro-learning into an already overwhelming academic schedule?

A: Start by identifying existing transition moments – walking between buildings, waiting for meetings to start, commuting, or brief breaks between tasks. These “dead time” periods can be transformed into productive learning opportunities without adding to your schedule. Begin with just 2-3 sessions per day and gradually expand as you see benefits.

Q: Is micro-learning effective for preparing for comprehensive exams or major presentations?

A: Yes, it can be particularly effective for comprehensive exam preparation because it naturally incorporates the spacing and repetition that optimize long-term retention. For major presentations, use short sessions to build content knowledge and longer sessions for practice and refinement.

Q: How long does it take to see results from academic micro-learning?

A: Most academics report noticeable improvements in knowledge retention and research productivity within 2-3 weeks of consistent practice. However, the full benefits – including enhanced research output and improved ability to make cross-disciplinary connections – typically become apparent after 6-8 weeks of regular practice.

Q: Can micro-learning help with academic writing and research productivity?

A: Absolutely. Shorter sessions focused on reading and analyzing relevant literature provide consistent input for academic writing. Many academics find that brief, regular engagement with scholarly content generates more research ideas and insights than sporadic intensive reading sessions. The key is maintaining momentum through consistent small steps rather than waiting for large blocks of time.


Transform your fragmented academic schedule into a powerful learning advantage. Try Listening today and discover how short sessions with optimized audio content can revolutionize your research productivity in just 15 minutes at a time.

icon speak listening.com

Free trial

Easily pronounces technical words in any field

Try the app

Academic Success

Higher Education

Productivity

Study Tips

Recent Articles

  • good study habits

    10 Study Habits of Highly Effective Students

    Discover 10 effective study habits that top students use to excel. Boost your productivity and achieve better grades with these simple, proven tips.

    Effective learning strategies

    Good Study Habits

    Student Success

    Author profile

    Derek Pankaew

  • active learning strategies

    10 Active Learning Strategies

    Discover 10 active learning strategies to enhance engagement, improve retention, and create a dynamic classroom for better outcomes.

    active learning strategies

    collaborative learning

    experiential learning

    Author profile

    Amethyst Rayne

  • 10 Tips to Prepare For Your Thesis Defense

    10 Tips to Prepare For Your Thesis Defense

    Master your thesis defense with confidence! Discover 10 essential tips for graduate students to prepare and succeed in their final oral exam.

    Defense Preparation

    Presentation Skills

    Thesis Defense

    Author profile

    Amethyst Rayne

  • 10 Best Universities in Canada

    10 Best Universities in Canada

    Discover the top 10 universities in Canada, offering world-class education and diverse opportunities for students to thrive.

    Best Universities

    Canada

    Top Ranked Universities

    Author profile

    Glice Martineau

  • Public Documents

  • New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile

    New Archaeological Evidence for an Early Human Presence at Monte Verde, Chile

    Ancient History, History, Humanities

    Tom D. Dillehay , Carlos Ocampo, José Saavedra, Andre Oliveira Sawakuchi, Rodrigo M. Vega, Mario Pino, Michael B. Collins, Linda Scott Cummings, Iván Arregui, Ximena S. Villagran, Gelvam A. Hartmann, Mauricio Mella, Andrea González, George Dix

  • Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity

    Gender Differences in Emotional Response: Inconsistency between Experience and Expressivity

    Psychology, Social Psychology, Social Sciences

    Yaling Deng, Lei Chang, Meng Yang, Meng Huo, Renlai Zhou

  • Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

    Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency

    Health Policy, Health and Medicine, Public Health

    Jean Adams , Oliver Mytton, Martin White, Pablo Monsivais

  • Impact of common genetic determinants of Hemoglobin A1c on type 2 diabetes risk and diagnosis in ancestrally diverse populations: A transethnic genome-wide meta-analysis

    Impact of common genetic determinants of Hemoglobin A1c on type 2 diabetes risk and diagnosis in ancestrally diverse populations: A transethnic genome-wide meta-analysis

    Health and Medicine, Internal Medicine, Medicine

    Eleanor Wheeler, Aaron Leong, Ching-Ti Liu, Marie-France Hivert, Rona J. Strawbridge, Clara Podmore, Man Li,Jie Yao, Xueling Sim, Jaeyoung Hong, Audrey Y. Chu, Weihua Zhang, Xu Wang, Peng Chen, Nisa M. Maruthur, Bianca C. Porneala, Stephen J. Sharp, Yucheng Jia, Edmond K. Kabagambe, Li-Ching Chang,Wei-Min Chen, Cathy E. Elks,Daniel S. Evans, Qiao Fan,Franco Giulianini, Min Jin Go, Jouke-Jan Hottenga, Yao Hu, Anne U. Jackson, Stavroula Kanoni, Young Jin Kim, Marcus E. Kleber, Claes Ladenvall, Cecile Lecoeur, Sing-Hui Lim, Yingchang Lu, Anubha Mahajan, Carola Marzi, Mike A. Nalls, Pau Navarro, Ilja M. Nolte, Lynda M. Rose, Denis V. Rybin, Serena Sanna, Yuan Shi, Daniel O. Stram, Fumihiko Takeuchi, Shu Pei Tan, Peter J. van der Most, Jana V. Van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, Andrew Wong, Loic Yengo, Wanting Zhao, Anuj Goel, Maria Teresa Martinez Larrad, Dörte Radke, Perttu Salo, Toshiko Tanaka, Erik P. A. van Iperen, Goncalo Abecasis, Saima Afaq, Behrooz Z. Alizadeh, Alain G. Bertoni, Amelie Bonnefond, Yvonne Böttcher, Erwin P. Bottinger, Harry Campbell, Olga D. Carlson, Chien-Hsiun Chen, Yoon Shin Cho, W. Timothy Garvey, Christian Gieger, Mark O. Goodarzi, Harald Grallert, Anders Hamsten, Catharina A. Hartman, Christian Herder, Chao Agnes Hsiung, Jie Huang, Michiya Igase, Masato Isono, Tomohiro Katsuya, Chiea-Chuen Khor, Wieland Kiess, Katsuhiko Kohara, Peter Kovacs, Juyoung Lee, Wen-Jane Lee, Benjamin Lehne, Huaixing Li, Jianjun Liu, Stephane Lobbens, Jian'an Luan, Valeriya Lyssenko, Thomas Meitinger, Tetsuro Miki, Iva Miljkovic, Sanghoon Moon, Antonella Mulas, Gabriele Müller, Martina Müller-Nurasyid, Ramaiah Nagaraja, Matthias Nauck, James S. Pankow, Ozren Polasek, Inga Prokopenko, Paula S. Ramos, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Wolfgang Rathmann, Stephen S. Rich,Neil R. Robertson, Michael Roden,Ronan Roussel, Igor Rudan, Robert A. Scott, William R. Scott,Bengt Sennblad, David S. Siscovick,Konstantin Strauch, Liang Sun,Morris Swertz, Salman M. Tajuddin, Kent D. Taylor, Yik-Ying Teo,Yih Chung Tham, Anke Tönjes, Nicholas J. Wareham, Gonneke Willemsen, Tom Wilsgaard, Aroon D. Hingorani, EPIC-CVD Consortium , EPIC-InterAct Consortium , Lifelines Cohort Study , Josephine Egan, Luigi Ferrucci, G. Kees Hovingh, Antti Jula, Mika Kivimaki, Meena Kumari, Inger Njølstad, Colin N. A. Palmer, Manuel Serrano Ríos, Michael Stumvoll, Hugh Watkins, Tin Aung, Matthias Blüher, Michael Boehnke, Dorret I. Boomsma, Stefan R. Bornstein, John C. Chambers, Daniel I. Chasman, Yii-Der Ida Chen, Yduan-Tsong Chen, Ching-Yu Cheng,Francesco Cucca, Eco J. C. de Geus, Panos Deloukas, Michele K. Evans, Myriam Fornage, Yechiel Friedlander, Philippe Froguel, Leif Groop, Myron D. Gross, Tamara B. Harris, Caroline Hayward, Chew-Kiat Heng,Erik Ingelsson, Norihiro Kato, Bong-Jo Kim, Woon-Puay Koh, Jaspal S. Kooner, Antje Körner, Diana Kuh, Johanna Kuusisto, Markku Laakso, Xu Lin, Yongmei Liu, Ruth J. F. Loos, Patrik K. E. Magnusson, Winfried März,Mark I. McCarthy, Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Ken K. Ong, Nancy L. Pedersen, Mark A. Pereira, Annette Peters, Paul M. Ridker, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Michele Sale, Danish Saleheen, Juha Saltevo, Peter EH. Schwarz, Wayne H. H. Sheu, Harold Snieder, Timothy D. Spector, Yasuharu Tabara, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Rob M. van Dam, James G. Wilson, James F. Wilson, Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Tien Yin Wong, Jer-Yuarn Wu, Jian-Min Yuan, Alan B. Zonderman, Nicole Soranzo, Xiuqing Guo, David J. Roberts, Jose C. Florez, Robert Sladek, Josée Dupuis, Andrew P. Morris, E-Shyong Tai,Elizabeth Selvin, Jerome I. Rotter, Claudia Langenberg, Inês Barroso, James B. Meigs