Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals

Summary

Background Many journals now require authors share their data with other investigators, either by depositing the data in a public repository or making it freely available upon request. These policies are explicit, but remain largely untested. We sought to determine how well authors comply with such policies by requesting data from authors who had published in one of two journals with clear data sharing policies. Methods and Findings We requested data from ten investigators who had published in either PLoS Medicine or PLoS Clinical Trials. All responses were carefully documented. In the event that we were refused data, we reminded authors of the journal's data sharing guidelines. If we did not receive a response to our initial request, a second request was made. Following the ten requests for raw data, three investigators did not respond, four authors responded and refused to share their data, two email addresses were no longer valid, and one author requested further details. A reminder of PLoS's explicit requirement that authors share data did not change the reply from the four authors who initially refused. Only one author sent an original data set. Conclusions We received only one of ten raw data sets requested. This suggests that journal policies requiring data sharing do not lead to authors making their data sets available to independent investigators.

Key Points

• 1Only one out of ten data sets was obtained despite explicit sharing policies
• 2Authors often cited various reasons for refusal to share data
• 3Journal policies may lack enforcement mechanisms that ensure compliance
• 4Authors may struggle with providing well-annotated data due to time constraints or loss of access to original data
• 5Recommendations include journal requirements for de-identified data submission at publication time

Related articles

• Disentangling vegetation diversity from climate-energy and habitat heterogeneity for explaining animal geographic patterns

  This study investigates the relationships between vegetation diversity and animal geographic patterns, testing whether vegetation diversity can explain animal richness beyond the effects of climate-energy and habitat heterogeneity.

• Characteristics of Cells in Microanatomy and Embryology

  This document provides an extensive outline on the characteristics of cells, including their size, shape, number of nuclei, location of nuclei, and arrangement. It serves as a lecture guide for students studying microanatomy and embryology.

• MICROANATOMY & EMBRYOLOGY: NUCLEUS, CELL DIVISION, AND CELL CYCLE

  This document outlines key concepts in microanatomy and embryology, focusing on the structure and function of the cell nucleus, cell division processes including mitosis and meiosis, and apoptosis.

• Development of the Skin

  This document outlines the microanatomy and embryology of skin development, including the formation of skin layers, appendages, and glands throughout gestation. It serves as a comprehensive guide for students studying the integumentary system.

• Embryology of Muscle: Microanatomy & Embryology

  This document outlines the embryological development of various muscle types, including striated skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle, highlighting their origins, development process, and associated anatomy.