Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals

Summary

Background Many journals now require authors share their data with other investigators, either by depositing the data in a public repository or making it freely available upon request. These policies are explicit, but remain largely untested. We sought to determine how well authors comply with such policies by requesting data from authors who had published in one of two journals with clear data sharing policies. Methods and Findings We requested data from ten investigators who had published in either PLoS Medicine or PLoS Clinical Trials. All responses were carefully documented. In the event that we were refused data, we reminded authors of the journal's data sharing guidelines. If we did not receive a response to our initial request, a second request was made. Following the ten requests for raw data, three investigators did not respond, four authors responded and refused to share their data, two email addresses were no longer valid, and one author requested further details. A reminder of PLoS's explicit requirement that authors share data did not change the reply from the four authors who initially refused. Only one author sent an original data set. Conclusions We received only one of ten raw data sets requested. This suggests that journal policies requiring data sharing do not lead to authors making their data sets available to independent investigators.

Related articles

• Introduction to Applied Social Sciences

  This document is a lecture on applied social sciences that discusses its interdisciplinary nature, theories, and the application of various social science disciplines to address societal issues, including counseling, social work, and communication.

• INTRODUCTION: TĀ-VĀ (TIME-SPACE): THE BIRTH OF AN INDIGENOUS MOANA THEORY

  This article introduces the Tā-Vā (Time-Space) Theory of Reality, an indigenous Moana theory emerging from the Association of Social Anthropology in Oceania that critiques traditional Western notions of time and space through a cultural lens.

• Comparative Analysis of Taxonomic Classifications and Patent Law

  This document provides a comparative analysis of three papers spanning over two decades, discussing taxonomic classification approaches in biology and their implications for patent law, particularly in relation to evolutionary change and nomenclature instability.

• The Potential of Va Part 2: Theoretical Frameworks of the Va

  This article is part of a series exploring practice-led research and its significance through the lens of the Samoan concept of va, examining themes of identity, space, and cultural ideologies.

• Contemporary World Module Lesson 1: United Nations (UN)

  This document provides an overview of the United Nations, detailing its establishment, objectives, core mechanisms, and how it promotes peace, human rights, and economic development among nations.