Relational values resonate broadly and differently than intrinsic or instrumental values, or the New Ecological Paradigm

Summary

Value orientations used to explain or justify conservation have been rooted in arguments about how much and in what context to emphasize the intrinsic versus instrumental value of nature. Equally prominent are characterizations of beliefs known as the New Ecological Paradigm (NEP), often used to help explain pro-environmental behaviour. A recent alternative to these positions has been identified as ‘relational value’—broadly, values linking people and ecosystems via tangible and intangible relationships to nature as well as the principles, virtues and notions of a good life that may accompany these. This paper examines whether relational values are distinct from other value orientation and have potential to alleviate the intrinsic-instrumental debate. To test this possibility, we sought to operationalize the construct—relational values—by developing six relational statements. We ask: 1) Do the individual statements used to characterize relational values demonstrate internal coherence as either a single or multi-dimensional construct? 2) Do relational value statements (including those strongly stated) resonate with diverse populations? 3) Do people respond to relational value statements in a consistently different way than NEP scale statements? Data for this work is drawn from an online panel of residents of northeastern US (n = 400), as well as a sample of Costa Rican farmers (n = 253) and tourists in Costa Rica (n = 260). Results indicate relational values are distinct as a construct when compared to the NEP.

Related articles

• (Dis)ability: The Relational Dynamics of Disability and Social Structures

  This document explores dominant narratives surrounding disability, analyzing how language and societal structures perpetuate ableist attitudes and devalue disabled bodies within the context of colonialism, capitalism, and social norms.

• Depathologization from the Left

  This document critiques mainstream psychiatric practices and argues for a leftist perspective on mental health, emphasizing the need to reject the medical model of distress in favor of alternative approaches that address social and economic factors.

• Psychosocial Support and the Oriental Other: A Postcolonial (His)Story

  This document critiques the role of psychology and psychosocial support within the frameworks of colonial histories, exploring how these systems function as mechanisms of governance while obscuring the violence of displacement and forced migration.

• Collective rumination: When "problem talk" impairs organizational resilience

  This conceptual article explores how collective rumination—repetitive discussions focused on negative aspects of adverse events—can negatively affect organizational resilience by fostering a shared negative situational assessment among members.

• Resolving and Transforming Conflicts

  This document explores the nature of conflict, its causes, and methods for constructive resolution. It discusses interpersonal conflicts, the emotions such as anger involved, and offers practical strategies for managing and expressing anger effectively.