Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level

Summary

Despite their recognized limitations, bibliometric assessments of scientific productivity have been widely adopted. We describe here an improved method to quantify the influence of a research article by making novel use of its co-citation network to field-normalize the number of citations it has received. Article citation rates are divided by an expected citation rate that is derived from performance of articles in the same field and benchmarked to a peer comparison group. The resulting Relative Citation Ratio is article level and field independent and provides an alternative to the invalid practice of using journal impact factors to identify influential papers. To illustrate one application of our method, we analyzed 88,835 articles published between 2003 and 2010 and found that the National Institutes of Health awardees who authored those papers occupy relatively stable positions of influence across all disciplines. We demonstrate that the values generated by this method strongly correlate with the opinions of subject matter experts in biomedical research and suggest that the same approach should be generally applicable to articles published in all areas of science. A beta version of iCite, our web tool for calculating Relative Citation Ratios of articles listed in PubMed, is available at https://icite.od.nih.gov/.

Key Points

• 1The Relative Citation Ratio improves upon traditional bibliometric metrics by normalizing citations through co-citation networks
• 2It provides a field-independent measure of article influence
• 3The metric correlates well with expert evaluations of research impact
• 4A web tool for calculating Relative Citation Ratios for PubMed articles is available
• 5The document discusses the limitations of existing metrics like journal impact factors and h-index.

Related articles

• Microanatomy and Embryology: Cytoplasmic Organelles and Membrane Transport

  This document outlines the key concepts of microanatomy and embryology, focusing specifically on cytoplasmic organelles, their functions, membrane transport mechanisms, and cellular signal reception and transduction.

• Microanatomy & Embryology: Microscopy & Microtechnique

  This document outlines the fundamentals of microscopy and microtechnique as part of a course in microanatomy and embryology. It includes definitions, types of microscopes, and essential microtechniques for histological examination.

• Microanatomy & Embryology: Histology of Cartilage

  This document outlines a lecture on the microanatomy and histology of cartilage, designed for students in medical education. It covers various types of cartilage, their cellular makeup, growth mechanisms, and clinical correlations, particularly with osteoarthritis.

• Microanatomy & Embryology: Histology of Bone

  This document provides a comprehensive outline on the histology of bone, detailing its microstructure, types, cells, and functions, along with clinical correlations and learning objectives for students.

• Microanatomy & Embryology: Embryology of Cartilage

  This document outlines the embryological development of cartilage, focusing on the processes of endochondral ossification and the role of mesenchyme and chondrocytes in cartilage formation.