Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review

Summary

Background The quality and quantity of individuals' social relationships has been linked not only to mental health but also to both morbidity and mortality. Objectives This meta-analytic review was conducted to determine the extent to which social relationships influence risk for mortality, which aspects of social relationships are most highly predictive, and which factors may moderate the risk. Data Extraction Data were extracted on several participant characteristics, including cause of mortality, initial health status, and pre-existing health conditions, as well as on study characteristics, including length of follow-up and type of assessment of social relationships. Results Across 148 studies (308,849 participants), the random effects weighted average effect size was OR = 1.50 (95% CI 1.42 to 1.59), indicating a 50% increased likelihood of survival for participants with stronger social relationships. This finding remained consistent across age, sex, initial health status, cause of death, and follow-up period. Significant differences were found across the type of social measurement evaluated (p<0.001); the association was strongest for complex measures of social integration (OR = 1.91; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.23) and lowest for binary indicators of residential status (living alone versus with others) (OR = 1.19; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.44). Conclusions The influence of social relationships on risk for mortality is comparable with well-established risk factors for mortality.

Key Points

• 1Stronger social relationships are associated with a 50% increased likelihood of survival
• 2The association varies by types of social measurements used
• 3Complex measures of social integration have the strongest correlation with mortality
• 4Recognizing social relationships as a health risk factor is crucial for public health interventions
• 5The review calls for greater integration of social relationship assessments in clinical practice.

Related articles

• How to Assess the Quality of Qualitative Research

  This article serves as a guide for health care practitioners, educators, and researchers on how to evaluate the quality of qualitative research. It discusses essential characteristics that make a qualitative study high-quality and trustworthy, as well as standards specific to this type of research.

• CHOLEGRAPHY Easy Visual Reviewer - Terms & Definitions Matrix Based on Module

  This document serves as an educational resource on cholegraphy, outlining procedures, indications, contraindications, and care related to the imaging of the biliary system. It is designed as a visual reviewer for learners in health sciences.

• Routine CT Procedures and Related Anatomy Visual Study Reviewer Matrix

  This document serves as a comprehensive reviewer for technologists involved in routine CT examinations, detailing essential procedures, patient preparations, and anatomical landmarks essential for accurate imaging.

• Investigating Genetic Counselors' Inclusion of Sponsored Genetic Testing Programs

  This study aims to investigate genetic counselors' awareness and attitudes toward sponsored genetic testing programs, as well as the factors influencing their decisions to offer these tests to patients. The importance of understanding these dynamics arises amid the growing availability of biopharmaceutical-sponsored genetic tests and the impact of financial considerations on patient access to care.

• Nature-Based Mindfulness: A Qualitative Study of the Experience of Support for Self-Regulation

  This qualitative study investigates how a five-day residential mindfulness program in a natural setting supports self-regulation among university students experiencing stress. Through interviews, the study explores participants' lived experiences and the perceived benefits of the mindfulness retreat.