Survey of Academic Field Experiences (SAFE): Trainees Report Harassment and Assault

Summary

Little is known about the climate of the scientific fieldwork setting as it relates to gendered experiences, sexual harassment, and sexual assault. We conducted an internet-based survey of field scientists (N = 666) to characterize these experiences. Codes of conduct and sexual harassment policies were not regularly encountered by respondents, while harassment and assault were commonly experienced by respondents during trainee career stages. Women trainees were the primary targets; their perpetrators were predominantly senior to them professionally within the research team. Male trainees were more often targeted by their peers at the research site. Few respondents were aware of mechanisms to report incidents; most who did report were unsatisfied with the outcome. These findings suggest that policies emphasizing safety, inclusivity, and collegiality have the potential to improve field experiences of a diversity of researchers, especially during early career stages. These include better awareness of mechanisms for direct and oblique reporting of harassment and assault and, the implementation of productive response mechanisms when such behaviors are reported. Principal investigators are particularly well positioned to influence workplace culture at their field sites.

Related articles

• Understanding My Socio-Political Identity: A Reflective Journey

  This document reflects on the author's socio-political awareness and identity over 4.5 years of training, exploring themes of privilege, marginalization, and personal growth against the backdrop of socio-political contexts.

• Exploring Socio-Political Awareness: A Journey of Identity and Reflection

  This document reflects on the author's journey of socio-political awareness and identity, detailing experiences related to privilege, marginalization, and the impact of gender norms through a Transactional Analysis lens.

• Understanding My Socio-Political Awareness Journey Through Transactional Analysis

  This reflective document explores the author's personal journey of socio-political awareness and identity, utilizing Transactional Analysis (TA) to navigate experiences of privilege, marginalization, and the complexity of queer identity. It delves into the author's confrontations with systemic oppression and personal growth over a span of training and introspection.

• Monopolistic Competition

  This chapter explores the concept of monopolistic competition, highlighting the characteristics that distinguish it from perfect competition and monopoly. It discusses the implications of product differentiation, market power, and firm behavior in this market structure.

• Reflections on Socio-Political Awareness and Identity Through Transactional Analysis

  This document reflects on the author's journey of understanding their socio-political identity within the context of personal growth, systemic inequalities, and the integration of Transactional Analysis (TA) as a framework for self-reflection.