Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threads

Summary

As breaking news unfolds people increasingly rely on social media to stay abreast of the latest updates. The use of social media in such situations comes with the caveat that new information being released piecemeal may encourage rumours, many of which remain unverified long after their point of release. Little is known, however, about the dynamics of the life cycle of a social media rumour. In this paper we present a methodology that has enabled us to collect, identify and annotate a dataset of 330 rumour threads (4,842 tweets) associated with 9 newsworthy events. We analyse this dataset to understand how users spread, support, or deny rumours that are later proven true or false, by distinguishing two levels of status in a rumour life cycle i.e., before and after its veracity status is resolved. The identification of rumours associated with each event, as well as the tweet that resolved each rumour as true or false, was performed by journalist members of the research team who tracked the events in real time. Our study shows that rumours that are ultimately proven true tend to be resolved faster than those that turn out to be false. Whilst one can readily see users denying rumours once they have been debunked, users appear to be less capable of distinguishing true from false rumours when their veracity remains in question. In fact, we show that the prevalent tendency for users is to support every unverified rumour. We also analyse the role of different types of users, finding that highly reputable users such as news organisations endeavour to post well-grounded statements, which appear to be certain and accompanied by evidence. Nevertheless, these often prove to be unverified pieces of information that give rise to false rumours. Our study reinforces the need for developing robust machine learning techniques that can provide assistance in real time for assessing the veracity of rumours. The findings of our study provide useful insights for achieving this aim.

Related articles

• The Puzzle of Minority Radicalization: Ethnic Bargaining and Government Response

  This book explores the dynamics of minority mobilization and radicalization, focusing on the interplay between ethnic identity, self-determination, and the responses of governments to minority demands. It delves into the theoretical frameworks of ethnic bargaining and how external actors can influence the trajectories of substate conflicts.

• Social Change and Development

  This document discusses the concepts of social change and development, exploring their definitions, characteristics, and various factors that influence them. It examines social change as it relates to community dynamics and societal evolution, alongside development’s connection to economic and social environments.

• Social Deviation and Social Work

  This document explores the concept of social deviance and its implications within the context of social work, detailing various historical views and theories that explain deviant behavior and the role of societal norms.

• Social Change and Development Theories

  This document discusses frameworks that explain the factors and processes contributing to societal transformations, emphasizing their importance in social work and community development.

• Introduction to Applied Social Sciences

  This document serves as a lecture on Applied Social Sciences, exploring the integration of various social science disciplines to address practical and social issues, highlighting theories and approaches to counseling and human behavior.