Association between Traffic-Related Air Pollution in Schools and Cognitive Development in Primary School Children: A Prospective Cohort Study
Summary
Background Air pollution is a suspected developmental neurotoxicant. Many schools are located in close proximity to busy roads, and traffic air pollution peaks when children are at school. We aimed to assess whether exposure of children in primary school to traffic-related air pollutants is associated with impaired cognitive development. Methods and Findings We conducted a prospective study of children (n = 2,715, aged 7 to 10 y) from 39 schools in Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain) exposed to high and low traffic-related air pollution, paired by school socioeconomic index; children were tested four times (i.e., to assess the 12-mo developmental trajectories) via computerized tests (n = 10,112). Chronic traffic air pollution (elemental carbon [EC], nitrogen dioxide [NO2], and ultrafine particle number [UFP; 10–700 nm]) was measured twice during 1-wk campaigns both in the courtyard (outdoor) and inside the classroom (indoor) simultaneously in each school pair. Cognitive development was assessed with the n-back and the attentional network tests, in particular, working memory (two-back detectability), superior working memory (three-back detectability), and inattentiveness (hit reaction time standard error). Linear mixed effects models were adjusted for age, sex, maternal education, socioeconomic status, and air pollution exposure at home. Children from highly polluted schools had a smaller growth in cognitive development than children from the paired lowly polluted schools, both in crude and adjusted models (e.g., 7.4% [95% CI 5.6%–8.8%] versus 11.5% [95% CI 8.9%–12.5%] improvement in working memory, p = 0.0024). Cogently, children attending schools with higher levels of EC, NO2, and UFP both indoors and outdoors experienced substantially smaller growth in all the cognitive measurements; for example, a change from the first to the fourth quartile in indoor EC reduced the gain in working memory by 13.0% (95% CI 4.2%–23.1%). Residual confounding for social class could not be discarded completely; however, the associations remained in stratified analyses (e.g., for type of school or high-/low-polluted area) and after additional adjustments (e.g., for commuting, educational quality, or smoking at home), contradicting a potential residual confounding explanation. Conclusions Children attending schools with higher traffic-related air pollution had a smaller improvement in cognitive development.
Related articles
Environmental Ethics and Philosophy: An Exploration
This document is an academic assignment exploring various concepts related to environmental ethics, ecology, and the philosophical relationship between humans and nature. It consists of multiple questions that require long-form answers discussing key themes and theories.
Environmental Ethics and Ecosophy: Concepts and Perspectives
This document discusses various concepts related to the environment, including definitions of ecology, ecosystems, and the philosophical framework of ecosophy. It covers the relationship between applied ethics and environmental ethics, the significance of ecosophy, and perspectives from classical Indian philosophy and religious viewpoints.
Our Planet: From Deserts to Grasslands - Full Episode
This document details various ecosystems and the interconnectedness of wildlife, showcasing topics such as wildlife migration, the impact of climate change, and the resilience of nature. It emphasizes the importance of understanding and supporting the natural world's functionality.
Types of Soil and Soil Conservation Measures
This document discusses various types of soil, their characteristics, formation processes, and measures for soil conservation to combat erosion. It covers soil types such as laterite and arid soils, and highlights the impact of human activities and natural forces on soil erosion.
A diversity of sustainable lifestyles in 2050: Future SLIM scenario narratives for deep climate change mitigation
This paper discusses four comprehensive lifestyle scenario narratives, known as the Sustainable Living in Models (SLIM) scenarios, which explore plausible alternative futures where lifestyle changes significantly contribute to climate change mitigation. The narratives emerge from multidisciplinary workshops and aim to inform policymaking by integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches.