Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data?

Summary

Background Current approaches to predict cardiovascular risk fail to identify many people who would benefit from preventive treatment, while others receive unnecessary intervention. Machine-learning offers opportunity to improve accuracy by exploiting complex interactions between risk factors. We assessed whether machine-learning can improve cardiovascular risk prediction. Methods Prospective cohort study using routine clinical data of 378,256 patients from UK family practices, free from cardiovascular disease at outset. Four machine-learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, gradient boosting machines, neural networks) were compared to an established algorithm (American College of Cardiology guidelines) to predict first cardiovascular event over 10-years. Predictive accuracy was assessed by area under the ‘receiver operating curve’ (AUC); and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) to predict 7.5% cardiovascular risk (threshold for initiating statins). Findings 24,970 incident cardiovascular events (6.6%) occurred. Compared to the established risk prediction algorithm (AUC 0.728, 95% CI 0.723–0.735), machine-learning algorithms improved prediction: random forest +1.7% (AUC 0.745, 95% CI 0.739–0.750), logistic regression +3.2% (AUC 0.760, 95% CI 0.755–0.766), gradient boosting +3.3% (AUC 0.761, 95% CI 0.755–0.766), neural networks +3.6% (AUC 0.764, 95% CI 0.759–0.769). The highest achieving (neural networks) algorithm predicted 4,998/7,404 cases (sensitivity 67.5%, PPV 18.4%) and 53,458/75,585 non-cases (specificity 70.7%, NPV 95.7%), correctly predicting 355 (+7.6%) more patients who developed cardiovascular disease compared to the established algorithm. Conclusions Machine-learning significantly improves accuracy of cardiovascular risk prediction, increasing the number of patients identified who could benefit from preventive treatment, while avoiding unnecessary treatment of others.

Key Points

• 1Machine-learning improves cardiovascular risk prediction accuracy
• 2The study analyzed data from over 378,000 patients in the UK
• 3Four machine-learning algorithms were compared to traditional methods
• 4Neural networks provided the highest improvement in predictive accuracy
• 5Enhanced prediction can lead to better-targeted preventive treatment strategies

Related articles

• Evaluating large language models for clinical note processing: local fine-tuning and internal-external validation using electronic health records from South Asia

  This research paper evaluates the effectiveness of large language models for processing clinical notes from electronic health records in South Asia, focusing on local fine-tuning and validation. It discusses the potential application of LLMs in clinical settings, particularly in resource-limited environments.

• Cardiac Cycle & Physiology: Understanding Cardiac Function

  This document provides a detailed overview of cardiac physiology, including the cardiac cycle, blood flow processes, and the cardiac conduction system. It aims to inform readers about the mechanics of the heart and its role in circulation.

• Cardiac Cycle & Physiology

  This document provides a comprehensive overview of cardiac cycle phases, blood flow through the heart, and the electrophysiology of cardiac conduction. It details the processes of deoxygenation and oxygenation of blood and the physiological aspects of cardiac output and common cardiovascular assessment findings.

• The Dual Pillars of Clinical and Community Care

  This document provides an in-depth examination of nutritional assessment and surveillance in clinical and community settings, offering guidelines on measuring malnutrition indicators and the importance of dietary interventions.

• Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen

  Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen Lecture | 14 October 2026 | 12 pm to 1 pm | AM103 The "Nespresso" of Diagnostics: Centrifugal Microfluidics for Point-of-Care Diagnostics; “Can we