CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children
Summary
Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a seven-point scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base.
Key Points
- 1There is significant disagreement among professionals about the criteria for identifying language impairments in children
- 2The study involved a panel of fifty-nine experts across multiple disciplines
- 3Consensus was reached on twenty-four of twenty-seven statements after a two-round evaluation
- 4The methodology emphasizes anonymity, qualitative feedback, and expert collaboration through the Delphi process
- 5A focus on pediatric populations aimed to improve early intervention strategies and practices.
Related articles
Absolutely. I based this on the 4th edition of Essentials of
Absolutely. I based this on the 4th edition of Essentials of Nursing Informatics that you uploaded. The book identifies Chapter 17 as “Theories, Models, and Frameworks” and Chapter 32 as “The Nursing
Anatomy and Physiology of the Respiratory System
This document provides a detailed overview of the anatomy and functions of the respiratory system, including structures, gas exchange mechanisms, and respiratory physiology. It covers both upper and lower respiratory tract components, physiological processes involved in breathing, and the impacts of various factors on respiratory health.
Blood Vessels and Circulatory System Functions
This document provides an extensive overview of blood vessel functions, classifications, structures, and the circulatory system's physiology. It details systemic and pulmonary circulation, highlighting the anatomy and roles of various arteries and veins.
Functions and Anatomy of the Lymphatic and Immune Systems
This document provides an overview of the lymphatic system's functions, anatomy, and its role in immunity, detailing structures such as lymphatic vessels, nodes, and organs. It also covers innate and adaptive immunity, including responses to foreign substances and the production of immune cells.
The Endocrine System
This document provides a comprehensive overview of the Endocrine System, detailing the various glands, hormones they secrete, and their effects on bodily functions. It explores the roles of each gland, the hormones involved, and the feedback mechanisms that regulate hormone levels.