CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children
Summary
Delayed or impaired language development is a common developmental concern, yet there is little agreement about the criteria used to identify and classify language impairments in children. Children's language difficulties are at the interface between education, medicine and the allied professions, who may all adopt different approaches to conceptualising them. Our goal in this study was to use an online Delphi technique to see whether it was possible to achieve consensus among professionals on appropriate criteria for identifying children who might benefit from specialist services. We recruited a panel of 59 experts representing ten disciplines (including education, psychology, speech-language therapy/pathology, paediatrics and child psychiatry) from English-speaking countries (Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, United Kingdom and USA). The starting point for round 1 was a set of 46 statements based on articles and commentaries in a special issue of a journal focusing on this topic. Panel members rated each statement for both relevance and validity on a seven-point scale, and added free text comments. These responses were synthesised by the first two authors, who then removed, combined or modified items with a view to improving consensus. The resulting set of statements was returned to the panel for a second evaluation (round 2). Consensus (percentage reporting 'agree' or 'strongly agree') was at least 80 percent for 24 of 27 round 2 statements, though many respondents qualified their response with written comments. These were again synthesised by the first two authors. The resulting consensus statement is reported here, with additional summary of relevant evidence, and a concluding commentary on residual disagreements and gaps in the evidence base.
Key Points
- 1There is significant disagreement among professionals about the criteria for identifying language impairments in children
- 2The study involved a panel of fifty-nine experts across multiple disciplines
- 3Consensus was reached on twenty-four of twenty-seven statements after a two-round evaluation
- 4The methodology emphasizes anonymity, qualitative feedback, and expert collaboration through the Delphi process
- 5A focus on pediatric populations aimed to improve early intervention strategies and practices.
Related articles
Evaluating large language models for clinical note processing: local fine-tuning and internal-external validation using electronic health records from South Asia
This research paper evaluates the effectiveness of large language models for processing clinical notes from electronic health records in South Asia, focusing on local fine-tuning and validation. It discusses the potential application of LLMs in clinical settings, particularly in resource-limited environments.
Cardiac Cycle & Physiology: Understanding Cardiac Function
This document provides a detailed overview of cardiac physiology, including the cardiac cycle, blood flow processes, and the cardiac conduction system. It aims to inform readers about the mechanics of the heart and its role in circulation.
Cardiac Cycle & Physiology
This document provides a comprehensive overview of cardiac cycle phases, blood flow through the heart, and the electrophysiology of cardiac conduction. It details the processes of deoxygenation and oxygenation of blood and the physiological aspects of cardiac output and common cardiovascular assessment findings.
The Dual Pillars of Clinical and Community Care
This document provides an in-depth examination of nutritional assessment and surveillance in clinical and community settings, offering guidelines on measuring malnutrition indicators and the importance of dietary interventions.
Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen
Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen Lecture | 14 October 2026 | 12 pm to 1 pm | AM103 The "Nespresso" of Diagnostics: Centrifugal Microfluidics for Point-of-Care Diagnostics; “Can we