Do Interventions Designed to Support Shared Decision-Making Reduce Health Inequalities? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Summary

Background Increasing patient engagement in healthcare has become a health policy priority. However, there has been concern that promoting supported shared decision-making could increase health inequalities. Objective To evaluate the impact of SDM interventions on disadvantaged groups and health inequalities. Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. Data Sources CINAHL, the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, HMIC, MEDLINE, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, Open SIGLE, PsycINFO and Web of Knowledge were searched from inception until June 2012. Study Eligibility Criteria We included all studies, without language restriction, that met the following two criteria: (1) assess the effect of shared decision-making interventions on disadvantaged groups and/or health inequalities, (2) include at least 50% of people from disadvantaged groups, except if a separate analysis was conducted for this group. Results We included 19 studies and pooled 10 in a meta-analysis. The meta-analyses showed a moderate positive effect of shared decision-making interventions on disadvantaged patients. The narrative synthesis suggested that, overall, SDM interventions increased knowledge, informed choice, participation in decision-making, decision self-efficacy, preference for collaborative decision making and reduced decisional conflict among disadvantaged patients. Further, 7 out of 19 studies compared the intervention's effect between high and low literacy groups. Overall, SDM interventions seemed to benefit disadvantaged groups (e.g. lower literacy) more than those with higher literacy, education and socioeconomic status. Interventions that were tailored to disadvantaged groups' needs appeared most effective. Conclusion Results indicate that shared decision-making interventions significantly improve outcomes for disadvantaged patients. According to the narrative synthesis, SDM interventions may be more beneficial to disadvantaged groups than higher literacy/socioeconomic status patients. However, given the small sample sizes and variety in the intervention types, study design and quality, those findings should be interpreted with caution.

Related articles

• Nutrition and Laboratory Preparation: A Comprehensive Guide

  This document outlines fundamental concepts of laboratory preparation, nutrition assessment, diagnosis, intervention, and meal planning, emphasizing the importance of accurate measurements and procedures in both food preparation and nutrition care.

• Emergency and Disaster Nursing Care of Clients in Acute Biologic Crisis

  This document provides a comprehensive overview of emergency nursing care practices, focusing on the triage process and management of clients in acute biologic crises. It details the principles of emergency care, the roles of nursing in emergency situations, and the importance of proper documentation and consent.

• Filtration in an X-ray Tube (Detailed Notes)

  This document provides detailed notes on the process of filtration in X-ray tubes, explaining how it removes low-energy X-rays to enhance image quality and reduce patient radiation dose. It covers types of filtration, including inherent and added filtration, and their significance in radiology.

• Nursing Situations and Ethical Decision-Making in Community Health Care

  This document presents several situational nursing scenarios focusing on pregnancy, ethical principles, elderly care, record keeping, infection control, mental health, community health problems, and participative action research (CO-PAR) aimed at improving public health nursing practices.

• Veterinary Microbiology and Public Health

  This document serves as educational material on veterinary microbiology, detailing various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, their characteristics, and the diseases they cause in animals. It is intended for veterinary students and professionals to enhance their understanding of bacteriology in the context of public health.