Fecal Contamination of Drinking-Water in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Summary

Background Access to safe drinking-water is a fundamental requirement for good health and is also a human right. Global access to safe drinking-water is monitored by WHO and UNICEF using as an indicator “use of an improved source,” which does not account for water quality measurements. Our objectives were to determine whether water from “improved” sources is less likely to contain fecal contamination than “unimproved” sources and to assess the extent to which contamination varies by source type and setting. Methods and Findings Studies in Chinese, English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish were identified from online databases, including PubMed and Web of Science, and grey literature. Studies in low- and middle-income countries published between 1990 and August 2013 that assessed drinking-water for the presence of Escherichia coli or thermotolerant coliforms (TTC) were included provided they associated results with a particular source type. In total 319 studies were included, reporting on 96,737 water samples. The odds of contamination within a given study were considerably lower for “improved” sources than “unimproved” sources (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15 [0.10–0.21], I2 = 80.3% [72.9–85.6]). However over a quarter of samples from improved sources contained fecal contamination in 38% of 191 studies. Water sources in low-income countries (OR = 2.37 [1.52–3.71]; p<0.001) and rural areas (OR = 2.37 [1.47–3.81] p<0.001) were more likely to be contaminated. Studies rarely reported stored water quality or sanitary risks and few achieved robust random selection. Safety may be overestimated due to infrequent water sampling and deterioration in quality prior to consumption. Conclusion Access to an “improved source” provides a measure of sanitary protection but does not ensure water is free of fecal contamination nor is it consistent between source types or settings. International estimates therefore greatly overstate use of safe drinking-water and do not fully reflect disparities in access. An enhanced monitoring strategy would combine indicators of sanitary protection with measures of water quality.

Key Points

• 1Improved water sources still show significant fecal contamination
• 2Rural and low-income water sources have higher contamination rates
• 3Current monitoring metrics may overstate safety of drinking-water
• 4More rigorous water quality assessments are needed for true safety evaluation

Related articles

• Neonatal Disorders

  This document provides a comprehensive overview of neonatal disorders, including case scenarios and learning objectives targeted at third-year medical students. It outlines essential management plans and assessment procedures for common neonatal conditions.

• 13. Gross Anatomy: Muscles of the Hand

  This document outlines the anatomy of the intrinsic muscles of the hand, detailing their compartments and clinical significance, particularly in relation to carpal tunnel syndrome and recurrent branch injuries.

• 12. Gross Anatomy: RA Upper Extremities

  This document outlines a detailed guide on gross anatomy focused on the upper extremities, covering the shoulder, humerus, elbow, forearm, and hand/wrist series with an emphasis on radiographic examination techniques and anatomical considerations.

• 11. Gross Anatomy: Compartments of the Forearm

  This document outlines the anatomy of the forearm, detailing the anterior and posterior compartments, including the muscles, their origins, insertions, innervation, and actions. It serves as a comprehensive guide for students studying gross anatomy.

• 10. Gross Anatomy: Bones and Muscles of the Shoulder and Arm

  This document outlines the anatomy of the shoulder and arm, including details on the muscles and bones, their origins, insertions, innervations, and primary actions. It provides learning objectives that aim to enhance students' understanding of arm anatomy.