Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration

Summary

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Key Points

• 1The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items relevant to the reporting of observational studies
• 2It aims to improve the clarity of study designs and findings for readers
• 3The document provides examples and explanations for each checklist item to guide authors
• 4It addresses the common types of observational studies: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional
• 5Recommendations are intended to enhance the evaluation and dissemination of observational research results.

Related articles

• Evaluating large language models for clinical note processing: local fine-tuning and internal-external validation using electronic health records from South Asia

  This research paper evaluates the effectiveness of large language models for processing clinical notes from electronic health records in South Asia, focusing on local fine-tuning and validation. It discusses the potential application of LLMs in clinical settings, particularly in resource-limited environments.

• Cardiac Cycle & Physiology: Understanding Cardiac Function

  This document provides a detailed overview of cardiac physiology, including the cardiac cycle, blood flow processes, and the cardiac conduction system. It aims to inform readers about the mechanics of the heart and its role in circulation.

• Cardiac Cycle & Physiology

  This document provides a comprehensive overview of cardiac cycle phases, blood flow through the heart, and the electrophysiology of cardiac conduction. It details the processes of deoxygenation and oxygenation of blood and the physiological aspects of cardiac output and common cardiovascular assessment findings.

• The Dual Pillars of Clinical and Community Care

  This document provides an in-depth examination of nutritional assessment and surveillance in clinical and community settings, offering guidelines on measuring malnutrition indicators and the importance of dietary interventions.

• Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen

  Cather Simpson Lecture Research Brief Inaugural David Breen Lecture | 14 October 2026 | 12 pm to 1 pm | AM103 The "Nespresso" of Diagnostics: Centrifugal Microfluidics for Point-of-Care Diagnostics; “Can we