The Relationship of Sugar to Population-Level Diabetes Prevalence: An Econometric Analysis of Repeated Cross-Sectional Data

Summary

While experimental and observational studies suggest that sugar intake is associated with the development of type 2 diabetes, independent of its role in obesity, it is unclear whether alterations in sugar intake can account for differences in diabetes prevalence among overall populations. Using econometric models of repeated cross-sectional data on diabetes and nutritional components of food from 175 countries, we found that every 150 kcal/person/day increase in sugar availability (about one can of soda/day) was associated with increased diabetes prevalence by 1.1% (p <0.001) after testing for potential selection biases and controlling for other food types (including fibers, meats, fruits, oils, cereals), total calories, overweight and obesity, period-effects, and several socioeconomic variables such as aging, urbanization and income. No other food types yielded significant individual associations with diabetes prevalence after controlling for obesity and other confounders. The impact of sugar on diabetes was independent of sedentary behavior and alcohol use, and the effect was modified but not confounded by obesity or overweight. Duration and degree of sugar exposure correlated significantly with diabetes prevalence in a dose-dependent manner, while declines in sugar exposure correlated with significant subsequent declines in diabetes rates independently of other socioeconomic, dietary and obesity prevalence changes. Differences in sugar availability statistically explain variations in diabetes prevalence rates at a population level that are not explained by physical activity, overweight or obesity.

Related articles

• (Dis)ability: The Relational Dynamics of Disability and Social Structures

  This document explores dominant narratives surrounding disability, analyzing how language and societal structures perpetuate ableist attitudes and devalue disabled bodies within the context of colonialism, capitalism, and social norms.

• Depathologization from the Left

  This document critiques mainstream psychiatric practices and argues for a leftist perspective on mental health, emphasizing the need to reject the medical model of distress in favor of alternative approaches that address social and economic factors.

• Psychosocial Support and the Oriental Other: A Postcolonial (His)Story

  This document critiques the role of psychology and psychosocial support within the frameworks of colonial histories, exploring how these systems function as mechanisms of governance while obscuring the violence of displacement and forced migration.

• Collective rumination: When "problem talk" impairs organizational resilience

  This conceptual article explores how collective rumination—repetitive discussions focused on negative aspects of adverse events—can negatively affect organizational resilience by fostering a shared negative situational assessment among members.

• Resolving and Transforming Conflicts

  This document explores the nature of conflict, its causes, and methods for constructive resolution. It discusses interpersonal conflicts, the emotions such as anger involved, and offers practical strategies for managing and expressing anger effectively.