How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?

Summary

Social media has created networked communication channels that facilitate interactions and allow information to proliferate within professional academic communities as well as in informal social circumstances. A significant contemporary discussion in the field of science communication is how scientists are using (or might use) social media to communicate their research. This includes the role of social media in facilitating the exchange of knowledge internally within and among scientific communities, as well as externally for outreach to engage the public. This study investigates how a surveyed sample of 587 scientists from a variety of academic disciplines, but predominantly the academic life sciences, use social media to communicate internally and externally. Our results demonstrate that while social media usage has yet to be widely adopted, scientists in a variety of disciplines use these platforms to exchange scientific knowledge, generally via either Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or blogs. Despite the low frequency of use, our work evidences that scientists perceive numerous potential advantages to using social media in the workplace. Our data provides a baseline from which to assess future trends in social media use within the science academy.

Key Points

• 1Social media offers potential advantages for knowledge exchange among scientists
• 2A survey of 587 scientists reveals varied usage of social media platforms
• 3Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn are the most commonly used by scientists
• 4Many scientists see blogs as effective for communicating science to the public
• 5The data provides a baseline for understanding future social media trends in academia.

Related articles

• Is it coz I'm white?

  This chapter explores the author's experiences with cultural diversity and the challenges of addressing race and ethnicity in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. The narrative reflects on personal encounters with patients from various backgrounds, emphasizing the importance of acknowledging and understanding differences in therapeutic settings.

• When Self-Care is Not Neoliberal: Insights from Black, Decolonial, and Disability Feminisms

  This article critiques contemporary interpretations of self-care, examining how it relates to neoliberalism through the lenses of Black, decolonial, and disability feminisms. It clarifies the distinction between self-care as a neoliberal construct and as a crucial practice for marginalized communities.

• Loneliness is a feminist issue

  This paper explores the connections between loneliness and feminism, arguing that loneliness is not merely a personal affliction but a political issue shaped by social contexts and normative ideals. It critiques governmental narratives around loneliness and examines how feminist theory can provide a deeper understanding of its implications.

• Introduction to Special Issue: Evolution and Politics

  This document serves as an introduction to a special issue on the intersection of evolutionary psychology and politics, examining how evolutionary themes can help explain the rise of populism and political divides in the modern context.

• Taming Reproductive Women through Contraceptives

  This document examines the complex intersections of gender, sexuality, and medical technologies, focusing on non-normative sexual identities and the historical pathologization of these identities within medical contexts. It highlights the contributions of various scholars and the impact of social and cultural factors on sexuality.