How Are Scientists Using Social Media in the Workplace?

Summary

Social media has created networked communication channels that facilitate interactions and allow information to proliferate within professional academic communities as well as in informal social circumstances. A significant contemporary discussion in the field of science communication is how scientists are using (or might use) social media to communicate their research. This includes the role of social media in facilitating the exchange of knowledge internally within and among scientific communities, as well as externally for outreach to engage the public. This study investigates how a surveyed sample of 587 scientists from a variety of academic disciplines, but predominantly the academic life sciences, use social media to communicate internally and externally. Our results demonstrate that while social media usage has yet to be widely adopted, scientists in a variety of disciplines use these platforms to exchange scientific knowledge, generally via either Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or blogs. Despite the low frequency of use, our work evidences that scientists perceive numerous potential advantages to using social media in the workplace. Our data provides a baseline from which to assess future trends in social media use within the science academy.

Related articles

• (Dis)ability: The Relational Dynamics of Disability and Social Structures

  This document explores dominant narratives surrounding disability, analyzing how language and societal structures perpetuate ableist attitudes and devalue disabled bodies within the context of colonialism, capitalism, and social norms.

• Depathologization from the Left

  This document critiques mainstream psychiatric practices and argues for a leftist perspective on mental health, emphasizing the need to reject the medical model of distress in favor of alternative approaches that address social and economic factors.

• Psychosocial Support and the Oriental Other: A Postcolonial (His)Story

  This document critiques the role of psychology and psychosocial support within the frameworks of colonial histories, exploring how these systems function as mechanisms of governance while obscuring the violence of displacement and forced migration.

• Collective rumination: When "problem talk" impairs organizational resilience

  This conceptual article explores how collective rumination—repetitive discussions focused on negative aspects of adverse events—can negatively affect organizational resilience by fostering a shared negative situational assessment among members.

• Resolving and Transforming Conflicts

  This document explores the nature of conflict, its causes, and methods for constructive resolution. It discusses interpersonal conflicts, the emotions such as anger involved, and offers practical strategies for managing and expressing anger effectively.